If the
attraction of church isn't its 'cool' quotient, what is its attraction?
I do think
church should have an attraction factor, a number in fact. There are a few that
spring straight to mind.
Firstly,
and foremost, should be the very presence of Jesus in the church community, in the
worship, the word, the sacraments, and in the individual lives of those that
gather as the church.
Secondly, in
a world full of pretence, show, self marketing and masks, there should be an
attraction factor in the church in regards to authenticity, honesty, transparency,
acceptance and its ability to ask hard questions and not just offer easy
answers. The church should be a 'come as you are' community. There is something
beautiful about this. Though of course the church need not apologize for also
being a transformational community; 'come as you are' doesn't always equate to
'stay as you are.'
Thirdly,
there should be an attraction factor in the way that the church community loves
one another, cares for one another, stands with one another, celebrates with
one another etc. As a redeemed community, as an advance party of heaven's
invasion of earth, the church is a community (though flawed) that seeks to
dwell in right relationship with God, self, others and creation. There should
be something attractional about this.
And then fourthly, the church should also be a community that is relevant to contemporary society. Yep, I said it, RELEVANT and CONTEMPORARY. By this though, I don't mean cool. Remember my last post? Relevant to contemporary society doesn't have anything to do with being cool.
By relevant
to contemporary society I mean the, way in which it speaks the life of Christ into the issues, cultures,
addictions, pursuits, longings, questions and concerns, and worldview of its
particular context in history. This doesn't necessarily mean contemporary
mediums or packaging, in fact, you could argue that it may in fact require
counter cultural mediums and distinctly alternative packaging in order to truly
speak into today's cultural context. If the famous idiom 'the medium is the message' is true, then consideration must be
given to the ways in which the mediums the church use at times enhance our message
and other times distort it.
I think
that if the church is to remain contemporary it must also be ancient. It should
take seriously Jesus call to give, to pray, to fast, to turn the other cheek,
to lay down one's life, take up one's cross, die to self. It should encourage
stillness, reflection, contemplation. If people want to be 'pumped up' they can
take a spin class or go to an AMWAY conference or tune into Anthony Robins. The
church has some pretty ancient and some pretty unfashionable things to call
people to. Fasting in a world of consumerism focused on touch, smell, taste
experience? Have fun rallying the troops for this fun pass time!
At times,
the more contemporary we become, the more irrelevant we become. It's hard to
critique culture if we're not counter culture. And so it's an ongoing
back-and-forth shuffle, working to ensure that the Sunday gatherings on the
life of the church community are relevant to contemporary society,
that is...
they speak
hope and truth and love,
and promise and grace and forgiveness ,
and the reality of Christ, and of his life and his death and his resurrection,
and of his arms open invitation to follow,
right into the very heart of the issues and challenges of 21st Century living.
and promise and grace and forgiveness ,
and the reality of Christ, and of his life and his death and his resurrection,
and of his arms open invitation to follow,
right into the very heart of the issues and challenges of 21st Century living.
I know as a
local church pastor that sometimes we do this really well and that sometimes we
don't do as well as we would of liked. I know too that sometimes I think we've
nailed it and nobody says a lot and other times I think we've bombed it and
people say things like, 'now I wish every Sunday was like that!' You scratch
your head, trust God and push on. Jesus has a way of graciously meeting people
right where they are at.
When the
church speaks into the issues, the longings, the questions and concerns of its
contemporary context, ultimately, it is attractional. Why? Because people know
deep down that surely there has to be more to this life than this life. More
going on than just consuming and acquiring and tasting and experiencing and conquering
and striving and burning out and...
It's not
about being cool.
What's the point when your message isn't cool?
It's just confusing.
It's about Jesus, authenticity, love and a boldness to offer ancient truth into a 21st Century context.
What's the point when your message isn't cool?
It's just confusing.
It's about Jesus, authenticity, love and a boldness to offer ancient truth into a 21st Century context.
Check out these Christians in the Philippines worshipping together after Typhoon Haiyan. Come on! That's what I'm talking about. The real deal.
Side note:
I'm not here wanting to contrast attractional with incarnational. Ultimately
the church should be incarnational rather than attractional, that is, a church
that goes into the world rather than expects to attract people out of the
world. I'm talking about a different kind of attraction here and believe there is
a manner of speaking of the church as attractional that I think is appropriate.
No comments:
Post a Comment